Most state accountability systems rely on student summative test scores and graduation rates to identify struggling schools and inform decisions.
Student success indicators examine additional student outcomes as well as highlight disparities in learning opportunities and school and community conditions.
The types of student success indicators can be grouped into three categories: outcomes, access and context. Some examples are listed below.
Many researchers have well-documented the historic positive impact of test-based school accountability policies and consequences. However, the impact of this approach seems to have plateaued. Student achievement as measured by the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) has barely improved (and worsened in some cases) over the past decade. COVID-induced school closures in 2020 and 2021 have pushed student learning even further behind.
As required by federal law, every state accountability system already includes some indicators beyond test scores, and states’ school report cards already report a variety of additional data. However, these data don’t necessarily provide context for the root causes of persistent disparities. They don’t inform the understanding of policymakers and educators in envisioning new approaches.
According to a recent National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine panel, educational equity means:
Used intentionally, student success indicators should make accountability and improvement efforts more effective and more equitable.